『LATEST NEWS: NYT On The Verge Of Collapse Regarding Trump – Russia Conspiracy | DONALD TRUMP NEWS』は、2017-07-01 23:35:56に、Youtubeで公開された「字幕付き動画ニュース」です。
（動画の元ページはこちらをご覧ください。）
☆タイトル：LATEST NEWS: NYT On The Verge Of Collapse Regarding Trump – Russia Conspiracy | DONALD TRUMP NEWS
☆投稿者：Latest News 360
☆公開日：2017-07-01 23:35:56
☆視聴時間：5:11
LATEST NEWS 360 TODAY 7/1/2017
NYT On The Verge Of Collapse Regarding Trump/Russia Conspiracy
The New York Times has become the latest liberal mainstream media outlet forced to admit that it fabricated information relating to the Trump-Russia conspiracy, which has resulted in outlets such as CNN and the NY Times verging on the brink of collapse.
The story that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies agreed that Russia helped Trump get elected by hacking the DNC emails, turns out to be completely false.
On Thursday, the Times was forced into issuing a correction to their June 25 article which repeated the false claim.
Consortiumnews.com reports:
However, on Thursday, the Times – while leaving most of Haberman’s ridicule of Trump in place – noted in a correction that the relevant intelligence “assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”
The Times’ grudging correction was vindication for some Russia-gate skeptics who had questioned the claim of a full-scale intelligence assessment, which would usually take the form of a National Intelligence Estimate (or NIE), a product that seeks out the views of the entire Intelligence Community and includes dissents.
The reality of a more narrowly based Russia-gate assessment was admitted in May by President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan in sworn congressional testimony.
Clapper testified before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on May 8 that the Russia-hacking claim came from a “special intelligence community assessment” (or ICA) produced by selected analysts from the CIA, NSA and FBI, “a coordinated product from three agencies – CIA, NSA, and the FBI – not all 17 components of the intelligence community,” the former DNI said.
Clapper further acknowledged that the analysts who produced the Jan. 6 assessment on alleged Russian hacking were “hand-picked” from the CIA, FBI and NSA.
Yet, as any intelligence expert will tell you, if you “hand-pick” the analysts, you are really hand-picking the conclusion. For instance, if the analysts were known to be hard-liners on Russia or supporters of Hillary Clinton, they could be expected to deliver the one-sided reportthat they did.
Politicized Intelligence
In the history of U.S. intelligence, we have seen how this selective approach has worked, such as the phony determination of the Reagan administration pinning the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II and other acts of terror on the Soviet Union.
CIA Director William Casey and Deputy Director Robert Gates shepherded the desired findings through the process by putting the assessment under the control of pliable analysts and sidelining those who objected to this politicization of intelligence.
The point of enlisting the broader intelligence community – and incorporating dissents into a final report – is to guard against such “stove-piping” of intelligence that delivers the politically desired result but ultimately distorts reality.
Another painful example of politicized intelligence was President George W. Bush’s 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq’s WMD that removed State Department and other dissents from the declassified version that was given to the public.
Since Clapper’s and Brennan’s testimony in May, the Times and other mainstream news outlets have avoided a direct contradiction of their earlier acceptance of the 17-intelligence-agencies canard by simply referring to a judgment by “the intelligence community.”
That finessing of their earlier errors has allowed Hillary Clinton and other senior Democrats to continue referencing this fictional consensus without challenge, at least in the mainstream media.
For instance, on May 31 at a technology conference in California, Clinton referred to the Jan. 6 report, asserting that “Seventeen agencies, all in agreement, which I know from my experience as a Senator and Secretary of State, is hard to get. They concluded with high confidence that the Russians ran an extensive information war campaign against my campaign, to influence voters in the election.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Please SUBSCRIBE my youtube channel : https://goo.gl/KUf71B
SEE MORE:
– PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP January 11, 2017, News Conference | OBAMA AND Hillary Clinton https://goo.gl/FHY5Fh
– Synthetic Steve Scalise Shot in Virginia | James T. Hodgkinson : https://goo.gl/wZhXmz
– BREAKING NEWS CNN – President DONALD Trump News Today https://goo.gl/YZn7Ek https://goo.gl/YZn7Ek
Thanks you for watching !